State-Level Social and Economic Policies and Their Association With Perinatal and Infant Outcomes.

Policy Points State-level social and economic policies that expand tax credits, increase paid parental leave, raise the minimum wage, and increase tobacco taxes have been demonstrated to reduce adverse perinatal and infant health outcomes. These findings can help prioritize evidence-based legislated policies to improve perinatal and infant outcomes in the United States. CONTEXT: Rates of preterm birth and infant mortality are alarmingly high in the United States. Legislated efforts may directly or indirectly reduce adverse perinatal and infant outcomes through the enactment of certain economic and social policies. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review to summarize the associations between perinatal and infant outcomes and four state-level US policies. We then used a latent profile analysis to create a social and economic policy profile for each state based on the observed policy indicators. FINDINGS: Of 27 articles identified, nine focused on tax credits, eight on paid parental leave, four on minimum wages, and six on tobacco taxes. In all but three studies, these policies were associated with improved perinatal or infant outcomes. Thirty-three states had tax credit laws, most commonly the earned income tax credit (n = 28, 56%). Eighteen states had parental leave laws. Two states had minimum wage laws lower than the federal minimum; 14 were equal to the federal minimum; 29 were above the federal minimum; and 5 did not have a state law. The average state tobacco tax was $1.76 (standard deviation = $1.08). The latent profile analysis revealed three policy profiles, with the most expansive policies in Western and Northeastern US states, and the least expansive policies in the US South. CONCLUSIONS: State-level social and economic policies have the potential to reduce adverse perinatal and infant health outcomes in the United States. Those states with the least expansive policies should therefore consider enacting these evidence-based policies, as they have shown a demonstratable benefit in other states.

State and Local Government Expenditures and Infant Mortality in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that government expenditures on non-health care services can reduce infant mortality, but it is unclear what types of spending have the greatest impact among groups at highest risk. Thus, we sought to quantify how US state government spending on various services impacted infant mortality rates (IMRs) over time and whether spending differentially reduced mortality in some subpopulations. METHODS: A longitudinal, repeated-measures study of US state-level infant mortality and state and local government spending for the years 2000-2016, the most recent data available. Expenditures included spending on education, social services, and environment and housing. Using generalized linear regression models, we assessed how changes in spending impacted infant mortality over time, overall and stratified by race and ethnicity and maternal age group. RESULTS: State and local governments spend, on average, $9 per person. A $0.30 per-person increase in environmental spending was associated with a decrease of 0.03 deaths per 1000 live births, and a $0.73 per-person increase in social services spending was associated with a decrease of 0.02 deaths per 1000 live births. Infants born to mothers aged <20 years had the single greatest benefit from an increase in expenditures compared with all other groups. Increased expenditures in public health, housing, parks and recreation, and solid waste management were associated with the greatest reduction in overall IMR. CONCLUSIONS: Investment in non-health care services was associated with lower IMRs among certain high-risk populations. Continued investments into improved social and environmental services hold promise for further reducing IMR disparities.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine use in women during pregnancy: do their healthcare providers know?

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health reported in 2007 that approximately 38% of United States adults have used at least one type of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). There are no studies available that assess general CAM use in US pregnant women.The objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence and type of CAM use during pregnancy at one medical center; understand who is using CAM and why they are using it; and assess the state of patients' CAM use disclosure to their obstetrical providers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study of post-partum women was done to assess self-reported CAM use during pregnancy. Results of this survey were compared to results from a previous survey performed by this research team in 2006. Data were analyzed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: In 2013, 153 women completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 74.3%. Seventy-two percent and 68.5% of participants reported CAM use during their pregnancies in 2006 and 2013 respectively. The percentage of participants who reported discussing CAM use with their obstetrical providers was less than 1% in 2006 and 50% in 2013. Increased use of different CAM therapies was associated with increased maternal age, primagravida, being US-born, and having a college education (p ≤ 0.05). However, these factors were poor predictors of CAM use. CONCLUSIONS: Given the frequency of CAM use and the difficulty in predicting who is using it, obstetrical providers should consider being informed about CAM and incorporating discussions about its use into routine patient assessments.

The differential effects of maternal age, race/ethnicity and insurance on neonatal intensive care unit admission rates.

BACKGROUND: Maternal race/ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status (SES) are important factors determining birth outcome. Previous studies have demonstrated that, teenagers, and mothers with advanced maternal age (AMA), and Black/Non-Hispanic race/ethnicity can independently increase the risk for a poor pregnancy outcome. Similarly, public insurance has been associated with suboptimal health outcomes. The interaction and impact on the risk of a pregnancy resulting in a NICU admission has not been studied. Our aim was, to analyze the simultaneous interactions of teen/advanced maternal age (AMA), race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on the odds of NICU admission. METHODS: The Consortium of Safe Labor Database (subset of n = 167,160 live births) was used to determine NICU admission and maternal factors: age, race/ethnicity, insurance, previous c-section, and gestational age. RESULTS: AMA mothers were more likely than teenaged mothers to have a pregnancy result in a NICU admission. Black/Non-Hispanic mothers with private insurance had increased odds for NICU admission. This is in contrast to the lower odds of NICU admission seen with Hispanic and White/Non-Hispanic pregnancies with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Private insurance is protective against a pregnancy resulting in a NICU admission for Hispanic and White/Non-Hispanic mothers, but not for Black/Non-Hispanic mothers. The health disparity seen between Black and White/Non-Hispanics for the risk of NICU admission is most evident among pregnancies covered by private insurance. These study findings demonstrate that adverse pregnancy outcomes are mitigated differently across race, maternal age, and insurance status.

Optimizing patient/caregiver satisfaction through quality of communication in the pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing patient/family caregiver satisfaction with emergency department (ED) encounters has advantages for improving patient health outcomes, adherence with medical plans, patient rights, and shared participation in care, provider satisfaction, improved health economics, institutional market share, and liability reduction. The variables that contribute to an optimal outcome in the pediatric ED setting have been less well investigated. The specific hypothesis tested was that patient/family caregiver-provider communication and 24-hour postdischarge phone contact would be associated with an increased frequency of highest possible satisfaction scores. METHODS: A consecutive set of Press Ganey satisfaction survey responses between June and December 2009 in a large tertiary referral pediatric ED was evaluated. Press Ganey responses were subsequently linked to defined components of the electronic medical record associated with each survey respondent's ED visit to ascertain specific objective ED data. Multivariate modeling utilizing generalized linear equations was achieved to obtain a composite model of drivers of patient/caregiver satisfaction. RESULTS: Primary drivers of satisfaction and willingness to return or refer others to the ED were as follows: being informed about delays, ease of the insurance process, overall physician rating, registered nurse attention to needs, control of pain, and successful completion of postdischarge phone call to a family caregiver. Multiple wait time variables that were statistically significant in univariate modeling, including total length of time in the ED, time in waiting room, comfort of waiting room, time in treatment room, and play items, were not statistically significant once controlling for the other variables in the model. Type of insurance, race, patient age, or time of year did not influence the models. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving optimal patient/caregiver satisfaction scores in the pediatric ED is highly dependent on the quality of the interpersonal interaction and communication of ED activities. Wait time and other throughput variables are less important than perceived quality of the health interaction and interpersonal communication. Patient satisfaction has advantages greater than market share and should be considered a component of the care-delivery paradigm.

Forgotten parent: NICU paternal emotional response.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the presence of perceived paternal stress and depressive symptomatology in fathers of preterm infants over time. SUBJECTS: Fathers of NICU infants born before 30 weeks of gestation. DESIGN: Prospective convenience sample. METHODS: Consenting fathers were given 2 self-report questionnaires: Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and Parent Stressor Scale: Infant Hospitalization (PSS:IH) on 7th (time 1), 21st (time 2), and 35th (time 3) days of life. Objective measurement of illness severity was quantified by Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology. Statistical methods included generalized linear estimating equation and mixed linear modeling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stress and depressive symptomatology in fathers of preterm infants. RESULTS: Stress scores (PSS:IH) were unchanged over time (P = .62) indicating that fathers (n = 35) remain significantly stressed. Individual subcomponents of stress (parent role alteration, infant appearance/behavior, NICU sights/sounds) also remained constant over the study period (P = .05 for each). Stress scores over time were not modified by demographic characteristics (marriage, education, insurance). Mean depressive symptomatology scores (CES-D) decreased over time (P = .04). The percentage of fathers with elevated CES-D scores (>16) decreased from a baseline 60% but did not diminish between times 2 (39%) and 3 (36%). Parent Stressor Scale: Infant Hospitalization stress scores were correlated with CES-D depressive symptomatology scores (P < .01). Socioeconomic factors influenced initial CES-D scores, but only marriage ameliorated subsequent changes in measurements. Objective measurement of infant illness (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology) did not influence paternal CES-D or PSS:IH scores. CONCLUSION: Fathers of premature infants in a medical NICU demonstrated elevated levels of stress that persisted across time for all domains of measured stress. Paternal self-reported stress and depressive symptomatology was independent of infant illness. One third of fathers had persistently elevated CES-D scores. If these findings are representative of general NICU population, then the emotional needs of our fathers are not being fully addressed.

Assessment of neonatal ventilation during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine alterations in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) performance during clinical ventilator management. DESIGN: Clinical investigation. SETTING: Two level III intensive care nurseries in Wilmington, Delaware, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. PATIENTS: Thirty infants 1.49 +/- 1.01 kg with respiratory distress receiving HFOV. INTERVENTIONS: Due to the demonstrated benchtop load sensitivity of the HFOV (SensorMedics 3100), we hypothesized that measured tidal volume (Vt/kg) and high-frequency minute ventilation (HFMV) would vary inversely with respiratory rate adjustments and that ventilator performance will be affected with endotracheal tube (ETT) suctioning. Both Vt/kg and HFMV were recorded using a novel hot-wire anemometry technique at the time of ETT suctioning or changes in ventilator settings. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During HFOV it was found that Vt/kg = 2.52 +/- 0.68 mL/kg and HFMV = 69 +/- 45 ([mL/kg]2 x Hz); effective ventilation was observed in the range of HFMV = 29-113 ([mL/kg]2 x Hz). HFMV decreased with an increase in breathing frequency. Although there was a significant increase in the mean Vt/kg after suctioning events, there was no difference in Vt/kg or HFMV after disconnection of the ETT alone. There were significant alterations in HFOV performance as a result of clinical adjustments in respiratory rate and suctioning. In addition, we found that measured Vt during clinically effective HFOV is at least equivalent to expected deadspace. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of tidal volume and HFMV may be clinically important in optimizing HFOV performance both during ETT suctioning and adjustments to breathing frequency.

Attitudes toward pay-for-performance initiatives among primary care osteopathic physicians in small group practices.

CONTEXT: Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs reward physicians who meet-and electronically document-specific healthcare standards during patient encounters, incentivizing certain aspects of medical care. Although such documentation can be time consuming and technology intensive, noncompliance can result in decreased physician reimbursement. OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of primary care osteopathic physicians toward P4P initiatives. METHODS: In 2006, a 20-item questionnaire was mailed to 1000 osteopathic physicians randomly pulled from the American Osteopathic Association database for this cross-sectional, survey-based study. Distinctions were not made between physician practice type or group size when the mailing list was compiled. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty responses were received for a response rate of 23%. Of these respondents, 123 physicians (54%) were in primary care practices comprising fewer than five physicians. Of these practitioners, 94% felt unprepared for P4P initiatives, 81% did not have the resources for appropriate technological investments, and 75% required additional P4P education and training to respond to P4P initiatives. In addition, the 28% of respondents who used electronic medical records were almost five times more likely (odds ratio, 4.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-12.06) to report that they could meet P4P reporting requirements. The majority of survey respondents were skeptical that P4P would appropriately capture the quality of their work and did not believe that health outcomes should influence their reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Although the current study's sample size may limit generalizability, small group primary care osteopathic physicians will need assistance-both technological and educational-to meet P4P measures.